MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380537464 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.4.004

Utilizing e-learning and user loyalty with user satisfaction as mediating variable in public sector context

2023· article· en· W4380537464 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Neneng Sri Rahayu, Muhammad Hasan Dhiaullah, Alvita Marsha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoyaltyContext (archaeology)Knowledge managementPublic sectorComputer user satisfactionMarketingUser satisfactionSample (material)Quality (philosophy)Value (mathematics)Field (mathematics)Service qualityBusinessService (business)Computer scienceUser experience designPolitical scienceHuman–computer interactionGeographyMathematicsUser interface design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of information technology has caused people to consider how they can make effective and efficient decisions in various activities. The implementation of information technology systems is expected to be advantageous in facilitating these activities because such systems can provide decision-making support and contribute to the success of endeavors in areas such as business, economic, social politics, and education. One common tool used in learning systems is e-learning applications. This research aims to analyze the effect of e-learning on user loyalty with user satisfaction. This research, conducted in Jakarta, is explanatory in nature, targeting individuals who have utilized e-learning applications in their activities, particularly in the field of public sector activities, with a sample size of 163 public sector employees. Data was collected through online questionnaires, and hypothesis testing was conducted through the PLS-SEM method. The results indicate that service quality and perceived value have positive impacts on user satisfaction, which in turn, positively influences user loyalty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceFrench-language works237,207