MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380563797 · doi:10.1117/12.2664227

Generalizing the unscented Kalman filter for state estimation

2023· article· en· W4380563797 on OpenAlex
Quade Butler, Waleed Hilal, Brett Sicard, Youssef Ziada, S. Andrew Gadsden

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterUnscented transformKurtosisExtended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Invariant extended Kalman filterFast Kalman filterHeuristicGaussianComputer scienceSkewnessNoise (video)MathematicsAlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationStatisticsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent generalized unscented transform (GenUT) is formulated into a recursive Kalman filter framework. The GenUT constrains 2n + 1 sigma points and their weights to match the first four statistical moments of a probability distribution. The GenUT integrates well into the unscented Kalman filter framework, creating what we call the generalized unscented Kalman filter (GUKF). The measurement update equations for the skewness and kurtosis are derived within. Performance of the GUKF is compared to the UKF under two studies: noise described by a Gaussian distribution and noise described by a uniform distribution. The GUKF achieves lower errors in state estimation when the UKF uses the heuristic tuning parameter κ = 3 − n. It is also stated that when the parameter κ is tuned to an optimal value, the UKF performs identically to the GUKF. The advantage here is that GUKF requires no such tuning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it