MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380590052 · doi:10.4271/2023-01-1449

Data-driven Roughness Estimation for Glaze Ice Accretion Simulation

2023· article· en· W4380590052 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Ignatowicz, François Morency, Héloïse Beaugendre

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolverSurface roughnessComputational fluid dynamicsAccretion (finance)Surface finishGeologyMeteorologyMechanicsEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In-flight ice accretion on aircraft is a major weather-related threat. Industries use both experimental investigations in icing conditions and ice accretion solvers based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for aircraft development. An ice accretion solver couples airflow over the geometry, water droplets impingement, and phase change to compute the ice accretion. Such a solver usually relies on a two-equation model: a mass balance and an energy balance. Past studies highlighted the importance of the roughness-sensitive convective heat loss for energy balance. Uncertainties persist in the CFD models given the complexity of the ice accretion phenomenon, which usually mixes solid ice with liquid runback water (glaze ice). A major uncertainty is related to the surface roughness pattern, which is difficult to measure in experiments. The calibration of the roughness pattern for a CFD test case was seldom investigated in literature. Among the available calibration tools, the Bayesian calibration constitutes a powerful data-driven approach suitable for roughness pattern estimation. The objective of the paper is to set up a methodology for the roughness pattern calibration on an airfoil in glaze ice conditions. Specifically, this methodology determines the roughness pattern needed to minimize the root mean square error between the numerical and experimental accretions. First, an ice accretion solver implemented in SU2 CFD generates a roughness-sensitive ice shape database. Second, a Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) metamodel replaces the database. Finally, a Bayesian inversion is performed on the metamodel to determine the roughness pattern producing a realistic ice shape. The fidelity of an ice shape prediction is measured with a root mean square (RMS) error on the iced portion of the airfoil. Such methodology produces promising results, giving an accretion with a RMS error of less than 0.4% of the chord length compared to the experimental accretion thickness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207