MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380590294 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2005.0237

European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance ed. by Patrick Cheney and Frederick A. de Armas (review)

2005· article· en· W4380590294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mar�a Jes�s Lorenzo Modia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeFeelingAssertionContext (archaeology)Relation (database)BiographyPostmodernismLiteraturePsychoanalysisHistorySociologyPhilosophyPsychologyEpistemologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLR, ioo.i, 2005 193 the significance of the mother (mothers are important formale writers too, as we have seen in the discussion of Handke's work, while the parallel figure of the father often looms large in these narratives). This approach certainly allows for the discussion of feminist theory in relation to the writings of these women, and sometimes use? fully problematizes it, but the end result is a strange bracketing offof these works. Some odd conclusions are also reached, as in the generalizations about the figure of the mother as obstacle, when even the compliant mother can often function in the narratives of women autobiographers as a cautionary force and consequently act as an enabler; moreover, the association of negative emotions with the mother here is overwhelming and is not always supported in the texts discussed: for example, the assertion that, as Cardinal repeatedly expresses her love forher mother at the end of her narrative, she 'frees herself from the strong feelings she had towards her mother' (p. 127); by implication, strong feeling is negative and love is not a strong feeling! Despite some serious disagreements with this study, I nevertheless found it illu? minating. Its treatment of memory, of the interplay of past and present, of generic fluidities in the context of autobiography and postmodernism is most worthwhile. It also offersan excellent bibliography of primary and secondary sources. The first hundred pages or so are relatively free of typographical and syntactic errors, but the prevalence of these in the rest of the volume may suggest a certain haste, which is, perhaps, mirrored in some of the generalizations reached somewhat precipitously. University College Dublin Ursula Fanning European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Ed. by Patrick Cheney and Frederick A. de Armas. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and Lon? don: University of Toronto Press. 2002. x +366 pp. $65; ?28. ISBN 0-80204779 -3Patrick Cheney and Frederick A. de Armas's book is informed by both a modern and a traditional framework of study that has been revisited and has gained new currencies in theories of communication. These are understood as involvinga process in which a message is transmitted by an emitter/writerto a receiver/reader in a definite code and through a medium. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, literary studies were mainly centred on the author; however, in the mid-twentieth century?and mainly in post-war American literary criticism?the focus of scholars was on the text, with little attention paid to the other elements of the literary process. In the last quarter of the past century,the emergence of reader-response criticism saw this process turn full circle with its renewed emphasis on the role of the reader in literature. In the present day, literary criticism continues with this integrating perspective, although the focus may be on a particular aspect of the text under consideration. European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance is a case in point since, as its subtitle indicates, it is written from the point ofview of authorship seen in a new light, that of 'career criticism'. After the 'death of the author', declared by Roland Barthes, and Michel Foucault's questioning of his/her identity,this collection of critical essays 'connects traditional with revisionist notions of authorship and career' (p. 21), and it attempts to enlarge the concept and the function ofthe author, both as a construct and as an entityto be discovered. Thence, the firststatement in this review is commendatorysince this extensive study provides a new exploration ofa fascinating concept, that ofthe subject who produces a text and the historical framework that makes itpossible. The concept of agency is explored here from classical antiquity to the Renaissance by different generations of scholars belonging to English, Spanish, Classical, and Comparative disciplines. Young specialists and eminent scholars with expertise in 194 Reviews their respective fields of study contribute articles published in chronological order of subject, which offerthe reader a panorama of the building of literary careers from Ovid to English women writers of the Renaissance period. In the firstchapter John Farrell develops the idea that 'the literary career took shape in Rome [mainly with Virgil] under the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207