Cerebellar degeneration associated with HIV infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the features of the clinical presentation and evaluate the incidence of HIV-associated cerebellar degeneration in patients with progressive cerebellar ataxia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with progressive cerebellar ataxia were studied. Brain MRI study, assessment by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), screening for cognitive impairment by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) were performed. In patients with HIV infection, autoimmune, deficient and other causes of ataxia, as well as opportunistic infections, multiple system atrophy and frequent forms of hereditary spinocerebellar ataxias were excluded. RESULTS: Five patients (1.3%) were identified with a combination of cerebellar ataxia and HIV infection (2 men, 3 women, aged 31 to 52 years). The median duration of HIV infection was 5 years, the duration of ataxia was 1 year. In the clinical findings, in addition to progressive ataxia, pyramidal signs, dysphagia, less often ophthalmoparesis, dystonia, postural hand tremor, affective and mild cognitive impairment were observed. In three patients, brain MRI revealed signs of olivopontocerebellar atrophy, two patients had isolated cerebellar degeneration (mainly of the vermis). All patients received combination of antiretroviral therapy in various regimens, but despite this, ataxia was progressive. CONCLUSION: HIV infection is a rare cause of cerebellar degeneration. This diagnosis remains a diagnosis of exclusion to this day. Cerebellar degeneration can occur and progress even after achieving a stable remission of HIV infection while taking highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".