The dose-effect regularity of artificial dermis combined with growth factor in repair wound of luxation of the bone tendon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the treatment efficacy of the artificial dermis combined with growth factor surgery in patients with luxation of bone tendon (LBT). A total of 40 patients with LBT in our prospective clinical research are randomly allocated to following four groups: Control, low dose, medium dose, and high dose. The baseline characteristics, skin graft interval time, overage rate of regenerated tissue at bone and tendon, and visual estimation of patients were measured, which were then utilized to assess the treatment efficacy of the artificial dermis combined with growth factor surgery in LBT patients. Our outcomes indicated that the artificial dermis combined with growth factor surgery showed significantly less skin graft interval time, higher overage rate of regenerated tissue at bone and tendon, less Vancouver scar scale score compared to those treated by conventional imaging technology (all P < 0.05). It concludes that the artificial dermis combined with growth factor surgery can improve the treatment efficacy, and the medium dose growth factor is a promise dose to treat the patients with LBT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".