Liquid-Crystal Reconfigurable Coupler for Millimeter-Wave Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) coupler whose coupling ratio is controllable at millimeter-wave frequency is presented. To realize this unique property, the SIW coupler is loaded with a tunable liquid crystal (LC) in the central region. To increase, translate, and shift the tuning range of the LC to the required permittivity, an artificial dielectric slab (ADS) is introduced and validated. A new approach to locally increase the permittivity of the LC is presented, wherein the relative permittivity is increased over the desired band. Initially, the variation in the relative permittivity of the LC is 2.46–3.5; the slab offers an increment in the variation, from 8.82 to 14.7. Varying the permittivity of the slab in the central region enables coupling ratio control. Based on the investigation of the proposed model, the design requirements and physical parameters to achieve a wide range of reconfigurability are obtained at the millimeter-waveband. For experimental/demonstration purposes, two reconfigurable coupler prototypes with angles of 15° and 55° between the arms are fabricated and characterized. The results demonstrate a tunable operating frequency to a certain extent with a controllable coupling ratio between output ports from 0.5 to 15 dB. These results show very good agreement with the values determined via simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".