MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380624942 · doi:10.1142/s0218348x23020024

EDITORIAL

2023· editorial· es· W4380624942 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFractals · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsProfessional Engineers Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLicensePublishingLibrary sciencePoliticsSchools of economic thoughtWork (physics)DownloadManagementPolitical scienceSociologyComputer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide WebLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Big Data are transforming the way we understand and analyze complex systems.These fields have contributed significantly to various areas, including social sciences, economics, and finance.The advent of these technologies has led to the development of novel approaches to modeling and predicting complex systems.This special issue brings together 39 articles that showcase the latest research and advancements in these fields.The articles cover a wide range of topics, from Integrating Large-Scale Ontologies for Economic and Financial Systems to action recognition using a fractal neural network-based method.We believe that this issue will serve as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners and students interested in the latest developments in this rapidly evolving field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it