MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380626797 · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1235931

Editorial: Biomedical applications of water-soluble synthetic polymers

2023· editorial· en· W4380626797 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Liang, Fei Xu, Jiang Wu, Xudong Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerPolymer scienceNanotechnologyChemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editorial on the Research Topic Biomedical applications of water-soluble synthetic polymersIn recent decades, the fusion of polymer science and biomedical research has led to groundbreaking advancements, opening up numerous opportunities to enhance human health and medical interventions.Within the realm of biomedical applications, water-soluble synthetic polymers have become essential tools, fundamentally transforming drug delivery systems, tissue engineering, diagnostics, regenerative medicine, and more.These polymers exhibit a distinctive set of attributes, including biocompatibility, adjustable degradation rates, controlled release mechanisms, and the capacity to encapsulate and safeguard delicate biomolecules.Such characteristics render them remarkably adaptable and ideally suited for a diverse array of therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.In this Research Topic, we have gathered a few original research articles which highlight the potential of water-soluble synthetic polymers in addressing critical biomedical challenges.Below is a brief summary of published papers in this Research Topic.Osteosarcoma is a long-term threat to human health, especially for children and adolescents.However, common clinical therapies have the disadvantages of severe side effects and poor prognosis.For example, different types of bone defects may exist after osteosarcoma resection.Therefore, effective treatment of osteosarcoma combining tumorremoving and bone regeneration is urgently required.Based on the thermal sensitivity of tumors, magnetic hyperthermia with mild side effects has received much attention from scholars.Shi et al. designed a 3D printable magnetic hydrogel composed of water-soluble polymer gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and MeCFO (cobalt ferrite surface-functionalized with methacrylate groups) nanoparticles for osteosarcoma treatment.The MeCFO/GelMA hydrogel has high porosity and swelling ability, indicating that the hydrogel possesses sufficient space, good hydrophilicity, and good compatibility for normal cell growth.MeCFO at 50 μg/mL could not only decrease the cell activity of osteosarcoma cells, but also promote the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).Furthermore, the hydrogel with shear thinning property is suitable for serving as bioprinting ink to produce the desired structures using a 3D printer.Therefore, MeCFO/GelMA hydrogel with potential antitumor and bone reconstruction functions is a promising therapeutic strategy after osteosarcoma resection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0100.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologySame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207