MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380630422 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.192

Indonesia Construction Service Law Relating to MRT Development Contracts: A Legal Review with Fidic International Contract

2022· review· en· W4380630422 on OpenAlex
Suherman Suherman, Annisa Mayangsari

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)PaymentBusinessService (business)Law and economicsLawFinanceEconomicsPolitical scienceEngineeringMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was very important because of incomplete regulations related to Late Payment Arrangements and Variation Procedure Arrangements which are regulated in the Construction Services Law because this was very necessary considering the complexity of problems that occur in the construction world in Indonesia. The amendments to the Implementing Regulations also needed to be improved as regulated in Article 51 of Presidential Regulation N0. 54 of 2010 concerning lump sum contracts, there were no price adjustments and additional work, because in fact any construction work for price adjustment and additional work almost always occurred and almost impossible to avoid. So that these regulations could not be applied in the field and could hinder the implementation of construction project work in Indonesia. It was because most of the construction projects in Indonesia required cooperation with foreign investors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it