MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380632635 · doi:10.3389/fpain.2023.1216764

Editorial: Pain in infants: pain management practices and the association with outcome

2023· editorial· en· W4380632635 on OpenAlexaff
Emma G. Duerden, Christopher McPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pain Research · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPain managementAssociation (psychology)Outcome (game theory)MedicineAcute painPhysical therapyPsychologyAnesthesiaPsychotherapistEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EDITORIAL article Front. Pain Res., 13 June 2023Sec. Pain Research Methods Volume 4 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1216764

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.299
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.204
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2990.204
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Pain ResearchSame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207