MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380667745 · doi:10.58205/fber.v2i3.696

الإبتكار ودوره في تنمیة المؤسسات الصغیرة والمتوسطة: البحث في التجربة الكندیة

2018· article· fr· W4380667745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
یاسین میموني

Bibliographic record

VenueFinance and Business Economies Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'innovation est devenue une nécessité absolue recherchée par chaqueentreprise de n'importe quelle nature, que l'innovation est l'une des éléments les plusessentielles de l'évolution des PME et la croissance en plus d'être l'objet de l'attention denombreux chercheurs, où occupe la stratégie d'innovation au premier rang dans lesstratégies d'entreprise, les petites et moyennes entreprises sont devenues importantesdans les économies des pays développés ,le Canada est parmi les premiers pays qui aaccordé une grande attention à la question de l'innovation au cours des dernières années,il a été démontré qu'en orientant sa politique vers le renforcement des projets innovantsdans les PME en plus de l'adoption de la plupart des programmes destinés principalementpour la recherche et le développement et l’accompagnement des projets innovants toutcela reflète positivement sur la croissance économique et donc le Canada est devenu l'undes principaux pays du monde dans le domaine de l'innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1870.112

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFinance and Business Economies ReviewSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207