Automatic depression severity assessment with deep learning using parameter-efficient tuning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: To assist mental health care providers with the assessment of depression, research to develop a standardized, accessible, and non-invasive technique has garnered considerable attention. Our study focuses on the application of deep learning models for automatic assessment of depression severity based on clinical interview transcriptions. Despite the recent success of deep learning, the lack of large-scale high-quality datasets is a major performance bottleneck for many mental health applications. Methods: A novel approach is proposed to address the data scarcity problem for depression assessment. It leverages both pretrained large language models and parameter-efficient tuning techniques. The approach is built upon adapting a small set of tunable parameters, known as prefix vectors, to guide a pretrained model towards predicting the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 score of a person. Experiments were conducted on the Distress Analysis Interview Corpus - Wizard of Oz (DAIC-WOZ) benchmark dataset with 189 subjects, partitioned into training, development, and test sets. Model learning was done on the training set. Prediction performance mean and standard deviation of each model, with five randomly-initialized runs, were reported on the development set. Finally, optimized models were evaluated on the test set. Results: The proposed model with prefix vectors outperformed all previously published methods, including models which utilized multiple types of data modalities, and achieved the best reported performance on the test set of DAIC-WOZ with a root mean square error of 4.67 and a mean absolute error of 3.80 on the PHQ-8 scale. Compared to conventionally fine-tuned baseline models, prefix-enhanced models were less prone to overfitting by using far fewer training parameters (<6% relatively). Discussion: While transfer learning through pretrained large language models can provide a good starting point for downstream learning, prefix vectors can further adapt the pretrained models effectively to the depression assessment task by only adjusting a small number of parameters. The improvement is in part due to the fine-grain flexibility of prefix vector size in adjusting the model's learning capacity. Our results provide evidence that prefix-tuning can be a useful approach in developing tools for automatic depression assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".