MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380680685 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1160291

Automatic depression severity assessment with deep learning using parameter-efficient tuning

2023· article· en· W4380680685 on OpenAlexafffund
Clinton K. Lau, Xiaodan Zhu, Wai-Yip Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health via Writing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVector Institute
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePatient Health QuestionnaireMachine learningTest setMean squared errorBenchmark (surveying)Deep learningSet (abstract data type)Data setData miningStatisticsPsychologyAnxietyMathematicsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: To assist mental health care providers with the assessment of depression, research to develop a standardized, accessible, and non-invasive technique has garnered considerable attention. Our study focuses on the application of deep learning models for automatic assessment of depression severity based on clinical interview transcriptions. Despite the recent success of deep learning, the lack of large-scale high-quality datasets is a major performance bottleneck for many mental health applications. Methods: A novel approach is proposed to address the data scarcity problem for depression assessment. It leverages both pretrained large language models and parameter-efficient tuning techniques. The approach is built upon adapting a small set of tunable parameters, known as prefix vectors, to guide a pretrained model towards predicting the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 score of a person. Experiments were conducted on the Distress Analysis Interview Corpus - Wizard of Oz (DAIC-WOZ) benchmark dataset with 189 subjects, partitioned into training, development, and test sets. Model learning was done on the training set. Prediction performance mean and standard deviation of each model, with five randomly-initialized runs, were reported on the development set. Finally, optimized models were evaluated on the test set. Results: The proposed model with prefix vectors outperformed all previously published methods, including models which utilized multiple types of data modalities, and achieved the best reported performance on the test set of DAIC-WOZ with a root mean square error of 4.67 and a mean absolute error of 3.80 on the PHQ-8 scale. Compared to conventionally fine-tuned baseline models, prefix-enhanced models were less prone to overfitting by using far fewer training parameters (<6% relatively). Discussion: While transfer learning through pretrained large language models can provide a good starting point for downstream learning, prefix vectors can further adapt the pretrained models effectively to the depression assessment task by only adjusting a small number of parameters. The improvement is in part due to the fine-grain flexibility of prefix vector size in adjusting the model's learning capacity. Our results provide evidence that prefix-tuning can be a useful approach in developing tools for automatic depression assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicMental Health via WritingFrench-language works237,207