Beneficial Effects of Two Marine Oxygen Carriers, M101 and M201, on Human Islet Quality in Hypoxic Culture Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High pancreatic islet sensitivity to hypoxia is an important issue in the field of pancreatic islet transplantation. A promising strategy to improve islet oxygenation in hypoxic conditions is to leverage the properties of hemoglobin as a natural carrier of oxygen. Studies using human or bovine hemoglobin have failed to demonstrate efficacy, probably due to the molecule being unstable in the absence of protective erythrocytes. Recently, marine worm hemoglobins have been shown to be more stable and to possess higher oxygen carrier potential, with 156 oxygen binding sites per molecule compared to four in humans. Previous studies have shown the beneficial effects of two marine worm hemoglobins, M101 and M201, on nonhuman pancreatic islets. However, their effects on human islets have not been tested or compared. In this study, we assessed the impact of both molecules during human islet culture in vitro under hypoxic conditions. Human islets were exposed to both molecules for 24 h in high islet density-induced hypoxia [600 islet equivalents (IEQ)/cm²]. M101 and M201 reduced the release of hypoxic (VEGF) and apoptotic (cyt c) markers in the medium after 24-h culture. Human islet function or viability was improved in vitro in the presence of these oxygen carriers. Thus, the utilization of M101 or M201 could be a safe and easy way to improve human islet oxygenation and survival in hypoxic conditions as observed during islet culture prior to transplantation or islet encapsulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".