MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380730421 · doi:10.1177/23969873231181628

The crosstalk between Stroke and Cancer: Incidence of cancer after a first-ever cerebrovascular event in a population-based study

2023· article· en· W4380730421 on OpenAlex
Catarina Guedes Vaz, Jéssica Rodrigues, Diogo Pereira, Ilda Matos, Carla Oliveíra, María José Bento, Rui Magalhães, Manuel Correia, Luı́s F. Maia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Stroke Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundCentre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-JustineFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsMedicinePopulationIncidence (geometry)CancerColorectal cancerInternal medicineCancer registryStroke (engine)Lung cancerCase fatality rateEpidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives: To determine the cancer incidence after the first-ever cerebrovascular event (CVE) and compare it to the cancer incidence in the population from the same region. Methods: We evaluated 1069 patients with a first-ever CVE (Ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack) from a prospective population registry of stroke and transient focal neurological attacks, diagnosed between 2009 and 2011. We conducted a structured search to identify cancer-related variables and case-fatality for a period of 8 years following CVE. Cancer incidence in CVE patients was compared to the North Region Cancer Registry (RORENO). Results: We found that 90/1069 (8.4%) CVE patients developed cancer after a first-ever CVE. Overall cancer annual incidence rate was higher after a CVE (820/100,000, 95%CI: 619–1020) than in general population (513/100,000, 95%CI: 508–518). In the 45–54 age group cancer incidence post-CVE was 3.2-fold (RR, 95%CI: 1.6–6.4) higher compared to the general population, decreasing gradually in older age-groups. Median time between CVE and cancer was 3.2 years (IQR = 1.4–5.2). Lower respiratory tract and colorectal were the most frequent cancer types. In univariable models, male sex (sHR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.17–2.72, p = 0.007), tobacco use (sHR = 2.04, 95%CI: 1.31–3.18, p = 0.002) and peripheral artery disease (sHR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.10–5.13, p = 0.028) were associated to higher cancer risk after CVE. After adjustment, tobacco use (sHR = 1.84, 95%CI: 1.08–3.14, p = 0.026) remained associated to a higher risk of cancer. Conclusions: At the population level, patients presenting a first-ever CVE have higher cancer incidence, that is particularly prominent in younger age-groups. Higher cancer incidence, delayed cancer diagnosis and increased mortality post-CVE warrants further research on long-term cancer surveillance in first-ever CVE survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it