MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380730525 · doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00223

Stabilizing α-Helicity of a Polypeptide in Aqueous Urea: Dipole Orientation or Hydrogen Bonding?

2023· article· en· W4380730525 on OpenAlex
Luis A. Baptista, Yani Zhao, Kurt Kremer, Debashish Mukherji, Robinson Cortes–Huerto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Macro Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research CouncilCanada First Research Excellence FundDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsHydrogen bondUreaAqueous solutionDipoleHelicityOrientation (vector space)Materials scienceCrystallographyHydrogenChemical physicsChemical engineeringChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsMoleculeGeometryMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a mechanism for α-helix folding of polyalanine in aqueous urea that reconciles experimental and simulation studies. Over 15 μs long, all-atom simulations reveal that, upon dehydrating the protein's first solvation shell, a delicate balance between localized urea-residue dipole interactions and hydrogen bonds dictates polypeptide solvation properties and structure. Our work clarifies the experimentally observed tendency of these alanine-rich systems to form secondary structures at low and intermediate urea concentrations. Moreover, it is consistent with the commonly accepted hydrogen-bond-induced helix unfolding, dominant at high urea concentrations. These results establish a structure-property relationship highlighting the importance of microscopic dipole-dipole orientations/interactions for the operational understanding of macroscopic protein solvation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it