MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380741679 · doi:10.1117/12.2664067

A cognitive dynamics framework for practical blockchain applications

2023· article· en· W4380741679 on OpenAlexaff
Naseem Alsadi, S. Andrew Gadsden, John Yawney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsAlberta Oil Sands Technology and Research AuthorityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlockchainCryptocurrencyComputer scienceControl reconfigurationSoftware deploymentComputer securitySustainabilityRisk analysis (engineering)Software engineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blockchain technology has gained notoriety as the foundation for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. However, its possibilities go well beyond that, enabling the deployment of new applications that were not previously feasible as well as enormous improvements to already existing technological applications. Several factors impacting the consensus mechanism must fall within a specific range for a blockchain network to be efficient, sustainable and secure. The long-term sustainability of current networks, like Bitcoin, is in jeopardy due to their relatively uncompromising reconfiguration, which tends to be inflexible, and somewhat independent of environmental circumstances. To provide a systematic methodology for integrating a sustainable and secure adaptive framework, we propose the amalgamation of cognitive dynamic systems theory with blockchain technology, specifically regarding variant network difficulty. A respective architecture was designed with the employment of Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) to control the difficulty of a network with Proof-of- Work Consensus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207