MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380762040 · doi:10.37058/aks.v3i1.3563

PERENCANAAN STRUKTUR BAJA PADA GEDUNG 5 LANTAI KANTOR KESEHATAN PELABUHAN PROBOLINGGO

2021· article· id· W4380762040 on OpenAlexaff
Raissa Alifah, Empung Empung, Rosi Nursani

Bibliographic record

VenueAkselerasi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakKantor kesehatan pelabuhan memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam mewujudkan kondisi wilayah kerja bandara dan pelabuhan yang bebas dari penularan penyakit, sebagai salah satu fasilitas public, dalam mengutamakan kenyamanan dan keamanan pengguna fasilitas maka direncanakan Gedung Kantor Kesehatan Pelabuhan Probolinggo yang terdiri dari 5 lantai dibangun dengan struktur baja. Perencanaan struktur atas pada gedung terdiri dari pelat atap, pelat lantai, balok, kolom dan core wall, serta struktur bawah yaitu pondasi. Analisis struktur gedung menggunakan STAAD.Prp v8i dan ETABS v.17. Perencanaan gedung mengacu pada literatur diantaranya Tata cara perhitungan Struktur Baja untuk bangunan (SNI 03-1729-2002), Perencanaan struktur baja berdasarkan Spesifikasi untuk Bangunan Gedung Baja Struktural (SNI 1729:2015) dan Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung (SNI-1726-2012). Beban yang dianalisis yaitu beban mati, beban hidup dan beban gempa. Dari hasil analisa dan perhitungan diperoleh yaitu dimensi terhadap bangunan yang meliputi pelat lantai menggunakan dek baja gelombang dengan ketebalan 11 cm pada pelat 1-5, balok anak WF 250.250.9.14, balok induk WF 350.250.9.14 , kolom WF 400.300.10.16. Core wall dengan tulangan D16-200 dan sengkang 2 D16-200. Perencanaan pondasi menggunakan tiang pancang dengan dimensi tiang 40 x 40 cm dengan kedalaman tiang 10 m, jumlah tiang bawah kolom 4 buah tiang dipakai dimensi pile cap bawah kolom 200 x 200 cm dengan tulangan D19-180, dan jumlah tiang bawah core wall 5 buah tiang dipakai dimensi pile cap bawah core wall 200 x 200 cm dengan tulangan D19-180. Kata Kunci: Beton, dek baja gelombang, komposit, perencanaan gedung, profil WF, STAAD. Pro , struktur baja.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAkselerasi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik SipilSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207