MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380763155 · doi:10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.9395

Abstract 9395: Natural History of Myocardial Injury Following Covid-19 Vaccine Associated Myocarditis

2022· article· en· W4380763155 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Mustafa Alhussein, Mohamad Rabbani, Bradley Sarak, Steven Dykstra, Dina Labib, Jacqueline Flewitt, Carmen Lydell, Andrew G. Howarth, Neil Filipchuk, Angela Kealey, Jillian Colbert, Nita Guron, Louis Kolman, Naeem Merchant, Murad Bandali, Mike Bristow, James A. White

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionMyocarditisInternal medicineCardiologyConvalescenceAcute myocarditisPopulationComplicationHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute myocarditis is a rare complication of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. The natural history and clinical sequalae of this complication are of critical importance to estimate the impact on population health. Objective: To study the impact of COVID-19 vaccine associated myocarditis on convalescent myocardial health, symptoms, and clinical outcomes. Methods: This study was performed at two tertiary care hospitals. Baseline and convalescent (≥3 month) CMR imaging was performed for 20 consecutive patients meeting Updated Lake Louise Criteria for acute myocarditis within 10 days of mRNA-based vaccination and with no evidence of active viral infection. Global and segmental CMR-based markers of myocardial injury were studied at baseline and convalescence, inclusive of chamber volumetry, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV mass, T1 and T2 mapping, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction. Major clinical outcomes were captured. Results: The median age was 23.1 years (range 18-39 years) with 17 (85%) being male. Convalescent CMR evaluations were performed at a median (IQR) of 3.7 (3.3-6.2) months. Five patients (25%) had a baseline LVEF <50%. All patients showed abnormal LGE inclusive of a sub-epicardial pattern with a mean LGE burden of 8.6+/-5.3% LV mass using a >5SD of reference threshold. At follow-up, a mean 3% absolute improvement in LVEF was observed, accompanied by a 7% reduction in LVEDV and 5% reduction in LV mass (all p<0.015). Global LGE volume reduced by 66% (p<0.001). Absolute reductions in global T2, native T1, and ECV of 2.1msec, 58msec, and 2.9%, respectively were documented (all p≤0.001). All patients with LVEF <50% at baseline recovered above this threshold. However, 18 (90%) patients showed persistence of LGE at follow-up with 15% having a burden >5% of the LV mass. No patient experienced major clinical outcomes. Conclusion: COVID-19 mRNA vaccine associated myocarditis shows rapid improvement in CMR-based markers of tissue edema, contractile function, and LGE, and was not associated with adverse events at intermediate range follow-up. However, convalescent fibrosis was commonly observed, justifying ongoing need for clinical surveillance in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→