Fundamental Limits of Doppler Shift-Based, ToA-Based, and TDoA-Based Underwater Localization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dear Editor, This paper is concerned with the underwater localization based on acoustic signals. Specifically, we will focus on the search of an underwater target that can constantly broadcast a beacon signal, such as a black box. Common measurements for localization are Doppler shift [1], time of arrival (ToA) [2]–[4], time difference of arrival (TDoA) [5], [6], angle of arrival (AoA) [7], etc. In this paper we will investigate the fundamental limits of Doppler shift-Based, ToA-Based, TDoA-based underwater localization. Note that AoA is not covered, because Doppler shift can be viewed as one type of AoA. The discussion will focus on short-baseline positioning with a mobile anchor, i.e., an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). Due to the large distance and the limited battery life of the AUV, the target is quite likely to lie outside the convex hull of the AUV's trajectory. In such cases, we will show that accurate localization is almost impossible by exclusively dependent on a single type of measurements. However, system performance will be significantly improved by combing Doppler shift with ToA or TDoA measurements. The reason for such improvement will be unveiled theoretically and numerically in this letter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it