Approche réflexive de la conception modulaire en Français sur Objectifs Universitaires et en littéracies universitaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le nombre chaque année croissant d’étudiants français et internationaux dans les établissements supérieurs en France a engagé une multiplication des offres de formation aux méthodologies universitaires. La grande hétérogénéité de ce public nécessite d’opérer des choix dans les dispositifs mis en place : une démarche générique couvrant un public large ou au contraire une démarche micro mais qui ne peut être déployée en dehors du cadre de la discipline. L’article présente la réflexion menée à l’occasion de la mise en place du projet FRançais ACadémique de l’Université Paul-Valéry, dont l’objectif est de concilier les niveaux macro-micro de l’ingénierie pédagogique en un niveau intermédiaire (méso).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".