MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380789288 · doi:10.4000/rdlc.12536

Approche réflexive de la conception modulaire en Français sur Objectifs Universitaires et en littéracies universitaires

2023· article· fr· W4380789288 on OpenAlexaff
Élodie Lang, Marie Beillet

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches en didactique des langues et des cultures · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le nombre chaque année croissant d’étudiants français et internationaux dans les établissements supérieurs en France a engagé une multiplication des offres de formation aux méthodologies universitaires. La grande hétérogénéité de ce public nécessite d’opérer des choix dans les dispositifs mis en place : une démarche générique couvrant un public large ou au contraire une démarche micro mais qui ne peut être déployée en dehors du cadre de la discipline. L’article présente la réflexion menée à l’occasion de la mise en place du projet FRançais ACadémique de l’Université Paul-Valéry, dont l’objectif est de concilier les niveaux macro-micro de l’ingénierie pédagogique en un niveau intermédiaire (méso).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches en didactique des langues et des culturesSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207