The Pilot Project for a Conference-Wide Church Multiplication Project in the Ontario Conference of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem An assessment of the vitality of the Seventh-day Adventist churches in the Ontario Conference revealed a lack of multiplying congregations. This finding raised serious concerns. At the same time, the Ontario population net growth continued to increase at a higher rate than the Conference average net growth. There is a need for an intentional approach in identifying barriers for church growth, developing a strategy to remove these barriers, and initiating a congregational culture change that would unleash a God-given multiplication potential in congregations. In order to facilitate the congregational culture-change process, coaching in ministry would increase the chances for an effective intervention. Method This intervention focused on the discovery process that would identify the obstacles to growth by employing the measuring instrument and emphasizing the qualitative factors of healthy congregations. The resulting analysis would inform the development of the strategy focused on eliminating the identified barriers. Furthermore, the analysis would show the collaboration of the intervention with the congregational potential to multiply. The pastors would receive support from a peer coach with experience in utilizing the measuring instrument throughout the intervention. Results This project determined that intervention with an emphasis on addressing the congregational minimum growth factor would increase congregational health and release the God-given natural development potential which leads to multiplication. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, two congregations that participated in the project successfully completed the intervention. The measurement instrument effectively discovered the obstacles to growth. The pastors, assisted by the coach, effectively led the strategic team to develop an action plan to eliminate the minimum factors. After six months, the analysis of the assessment instrument affirmed the projected outcome. Both participating congregations registered an increase in the average health score and showed improved scores in the minimum factor areas, in particular. Moreover, the multiplication theme average score proportionally increased as well. Conclusions The intervention revealed that the process leading to congregational culture change is complex and requires a willing congregation and a pastor who is a change agent. The critical element in the process is dependence on God’s leading through prayers, commitment to biblical principles, and faithfulness to the Great Commission. Therefore, Conferences worldwide should develop a comprehensive strategy in assessing congregational health by utilizing qualitative measuring instruments such as the Natural Church Development (NCD) survey. In addition, a Conference-wide coaching system should be established that provides peer-coaching support to pastors engaged in the congregational culture-change processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".