THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF DOXYCYCLIN ON CANINE HEPATOZOONOSIS: A CASE STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study represents the therapeutic efficacy of doxycyline on canine hepatozoonosis which is a vectorborne haemoprotozoan disease caused by Hepatozoon canis,transmitted by Rhipicephalus sanguineus bite, the brown dog tick.A 3 years old male Labrador weighing 24 kg was presented at TVCC, Belgachia, W.B.U.A.F.S, Kolkata (West Bengal).Physical examination revealed mild dehydration, pale mucous membrane, depression/lethargy, enlarged peripheral lymph node and discolouration of muzzle, surrounded area of eye and scrotum.On clinical examination, the dog showed fever, increased respiratory rate and tachycardia with the history of ectoparasitic infestation.On blood smear examination, gamonts of Hepatozoon canis organisms were noticed in neutrophils.Based on these observations the case was diagnosed as canine hepatozoonosis and treated with Doxycycline @ 10 mg/kg b.wt.orally daily for 21 days along with other supportive therapy tick remover, haematinic and hepatoprotectant.Uneventful recovery was noticed after 21 days of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".