MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 12552: Causal Effect of Exposure to Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels on the Blood Transcriptome : A Mendelian Randomization Study

2022· article· en· W4380794552 on OpenAlexaff
Jérôme Bourgault, Benoît J. Arsenault

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationGenome-wide association studyTranscriptomeMedicineGeneGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyGene expressionGenotypeGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is one of the strongest genetic risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Several ex vivo studies have revealed a pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic role of Lp(a) in the etiology of ASCVD, mainly through induction of inflammation, metabolic processes, and apoptosis. However, whether Lp(a) causally influences the human transcriptome is unknown. Here, we aimed at identifying whether genetically-predicted Lp(a) levels could also affect the whole blood expression of genes involved in metabolic- and inflammatory-related pathways. Methods: We performed a series of inverse-variance weighted mendelian randomization analyses using single-nucleotide polymorphisms located in the LPA locus (±500kb; p<5x10 -8 ) from the UK Biobank GWAS on Lipoprotein(a) quantiles as exposure (n=377,590 and whole blood expression levels of 14,288 coding gene from eQTLGen as outcomes (n=31,684 from 37 studies). We then used the Functional Mapping and Annotation of Genome-Wide Association Studies tool (FUMA) to identify gene sets for cardiometabolic- and inflammatory-related pathways from gene ontology biological processes. Results: The MR analyses identified 1363 genes that may be causally influenced by exposure to high Lp(a) levels (with p<0.05). The 10 most strongly associated genes with genetically-predicted Lp(a) levels are FSTL3 , PRKC1 , PDE6C , PLXNB3 , SESN1 , SASH1 , CD1D , CCDC102A , SS18L1 and TCF12 . These genes are also differentially expressed in the heart. We identified 16 cardiometabolic-related pathways, mostly related to immune response, signaling, apoptosis, cardiovascular and vasculature development, cell proliferation, metabolic process, and catalytic activity. The 5 most significant pathways are regulation of cell population proliferation, regulation of intracellular signal transduction, positive regulation of cell population proliferation, cardiovascular system development and TOR signaling. Conclusions: Results of this study highlight a potentially causal effect of exposure to elevated Lp(a) levels on several key genes involved in metabolic processes and inflammation and provide mechanistic insight on the pathobiological role of Lp(a) in the etiology of ASCVD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→