MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14708: Cardiovascular Calcium Scoring by Deep Learning is Predictive of Mortality in Emergency Department Patients

2022· article· en· W4380795566 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ding Yi Zhang, Maude Roberge, Rushali Gandhi, Yaman Zarour, Farida El Malt, Albert Shalmiev, Jordan Benzur, Mhd Diaa Chalati, Nissim Benizri, Neetika Bharaj, Marc Afilalo, Jonathan Afilalo

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentInternal medicineCalcificationCardiologyProspective cohort studyPopulationLogistic regressionRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) imaging is widely used in the emergency department (ED) setting. Calcifications of the coronary arteries, heart valves, and aorta are common incidental findings that may herald clinical or subclinical cardiovascular disease. Hypothesis: We sought to determine whether the quantitative burden of cardiovascular calcifications, as measured by a CT-based deep learning pipeline, would be predictive of short-term mortality in a diverse population of ED patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective single-center cohort study nested in the Quebec COVID-19 Biobank from March 2020 to September 2021. For the purposes of this study, we enlisted adult patients presenting to the ED with cardiopulmonary symptoms who were tested for COVID-19 and underwent CT imaging of the chest. We used a deep learning model previously developed by our team to automate the quantitative scoring of coronary artery calcification (CAC), aortic valve calcification (AVC), mitral annular calcification (MAC), and thoracic aorta calcification (TAC) from the CT images. These calcium scores were categorized as sex-stratified tertiles plus a zero-score referent category. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 and 90 days adjusted for age, sex, and COVID-19 status using multivariable logistic regression. Results: The study sample consisted of 731 ED visits among 271 unique patients with a mean age of 66 years and 47% females. COVID-19 illness was the main diagnosis in 29% of ED visits. The prevalence of any quantifiable calcification was 51% for CAC, 33% for AVC, 23% for MAC, and 80% for TAC. The statistically significant adjusted odds ratios for mortality were 2.50 (1.08, 5.81) in the highest AVC tertile at 30 days, 2.73 (1.37 5.47) in the highest CAC tertile at 90 days, and 4.42 (1.01, 19.4) in the highest TAC tertile at 90 days. These odds ratio remained similar after further adjustment for past history of myocardial infarction or heart failure. Conclusions: High calcium scores in the coronary arteries, aortic valve, and thoracic aorta are associated with heightened 30-day mortality in ED patients. Deep learning quantification of calcium scores from clinical CT scans is an opportunistic approach for risk stratification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207