Speeding Up the Structural Analysis of Metabolic Network Models Using the Fredman–Khachiyan Algorithm B
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of computing the Elementary Flux Modes (EFMs) and Minimal Cut Sets (MCSs) of metabolic network is a fundamental one in metabolic networks. A key insight is that they can be understood as a dual pair of monotone Boolean functions (MBFs). Using this insight, this computation reduces to the question of generating from an oracle a dual pair of MBFs. If one of the two sets (functions) is known, then the other can be computed through a process known as dualization. Fredman and Khachiyan provided two algorithms, which they called simply A and B that can serve as an engine for oracle-based generation or dualization of MBFs. We look at efficiencies available in implementing their algorithm B, which we will refer to as FK-B. Like their algorithm A, FK-B certifies whether two given MBFs in the form of Conjunctive Normal Form and Disjunctive Normal Form are dual or not, and in case of not being dual it returns a conflicting assignment (CA), that is, an assignment that makes one of the given Boolean functions True and the other one False. The FK-B algorithm is a recursive algorithm that searches through the tree of assignments to find a CA. If it does not find any CA, it means that the given Boolean functions are dual. In this article, we propose six techniques applicable to the FK-B and hence to the dualization process. Although these techniques do not reduce the time complexity, they considerably reduce the running time in practice. We evaluate the proposed improvements by applying them to compute the MCSs from the EFMs in the 19 small- and medium-sized models from the BioModels database along with 4 models of biomass synthesis in Escherichia coli that were used in an earlier computational survey Haus et al. (2008).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".