MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380873810 · doi:10.1145/3591156.3591176

Audio Super-resolution Using Feed-Forward Neural Networks

2023· article· en· W4380873810 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEncoderAudio signalAudio signal flowLossy compressionAudio signal processingSpeech recognitionReal-time computingComputer hardwareSpeech codingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a system for reducing the file size of an audio signal, and then performing super-resolution on the resultant signal to estimate the original, is proposed and designed. This design takes influence from the principles of audio sampling, as well as super-resolution systems designed for visual media, and is split into an encoder and a decoder. The encoder successfully reduces the file size of the audio file by a significant amount. The super-resolution-based decoder can also successfully generate a matching high-frequency audio track that can be combined with the encoded lossy audio in order to estimate the original audio with a reasonable degree of audible accuracy. While a number of improvements to the system can be made in the future, it shows great promise, as it accomplishes the goals it was designed to meet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207