MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380873860 · doi:10.1101/2023.06.15.23291345

The relative effectiveness of a high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines in older adults in France: a retrospective cohort study during the 2021-22 influenza season

2023· preprint· en· W4380873860 on OpenAlexaff
Hélène Bricout, Levant Marie-Cécile, Nada Assi, Pascal Crépey, Descamps Alexandre, Mari Karine, Gaillat Jacques, Gavazzi Gaétan, Benjamin Grenier, Odile Launay, Anne Mosnier, F. Raguideau, Watier Laurence, Rebecca C. Harris, Chit Ayman

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersStrongSanofi
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationDemographySeasonal influenzaPoisson regressionPropensity score matchingVirologyPopulationEnvironmental healthInternal medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background High-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (HD-QIV) was introduced during the 2021/22 influenza season in France for adults aged ≥65 years as an alternative to standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines (SD-QIV). This is the first study to estimate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-QIV versus SD-QIV against influenza-related hospitalizations in France. Methods Community-dwelling individuals aged ≥65 years with reimbursed influenza vaccine claims during the 2021/22 influenza season were included from the French national health insurance database. Individuals were followed up from vaccination day to 30 June 2022, nursing home admission or death date. Baseline socio-demographic and health characteristics were identified from medical records over the 5 previous years. Hospitalizations due to influenza and other causes were recorded from 14 days after vaccination to end of follow-up. HD-QIV and SD-QIV vaccinees were matched using 1:4 propensity score matching with an exact constraint on age group, sex, week of vaccination and region. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated using zero-inflated Poisson or zero-inflated negative binomial regression models. Results We matched 405,385 (99.9%) HD-QIV to 1,621,540 SD-QIV vaccinees. HD-QIV was associated with a 23.3% (95%CI: 8.4–35.8) lower rate of influenza hospitalizations compared to SD-QIV. Post-matching, we observed higher rates in the HD-QIV group for hospitalizations non-specific to influenza and for negative control outcomes, suggesting residual confounding by indication. Conclusions HD-QIV was associated with lower influenza-related hospitalization rates versus SD-QIV, consistent with existing evidence, in the context of high SARS-CoV-2 circulation in France and likely prioritization of HD-QIV for older/more comorbid individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→