MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380873994 · doi:10.3138/ctr.102.012

Special Festivals Review Section

2000· article· en· W4380873994 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Maria DiCenzo, R. Knowles

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeadlineHistorySection (typography)ArtPower (physics)Visual artsWhite (mutation)EstateArt historyMedia studiesAdvertisingSociologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eighth edition of the Theatre Festival of the Americas (FTA) got off to a rough start. On opening night, after the festivities and the seemingly endless number of welcomes from politicians and sponsors at the Monument National had ended, the bulk of the opening night audience made its way over to Usine C, where Paula de Vasconcelos’s Les Bacchantes was scheduled as the main opening night event. Less than fifteen minutes into the show, however, the power went out, and some time later the performance was cancelled, leaving organizers scrambling to rearrange tickets for reviewers and others. The next day – the day before its scheduled opening – word came that another of the festival’s headline events from Montreal, Brigitte Haentjens’s production of Malina, was cancelled altogether when adaptation rights were oddly and belatedly refused by the estate of Ingeborg Bachmann.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2110.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicTheatre and Performance Studies→French-language works237,207→