MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380874081 · doi:10.3138/ctr.107.007

Seeing the Light: Montreal’s Axel Morgenthaler

2001· article· en· W4380874081 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ana Cappeluto, Edward Little

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyPerforming artsThe artsDancePerformance artOperaPaintingArtReputationVisual artsHistoryMedia studiesSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before moving to Canada in 1991, Swiss-born Axel Morgenthaler worked as a lighting designer for Italian actor Massimo Rocchi, toured international festival circuits and worked as assistant painter for Sol LeWitt. Since his arrival in Montreal, Morgenthaler has established a reputation as one of Quebec’s leading innovators in visual and lighting design. His work has been seen across Canada, the United States and Europe, in production with companies including LaLaLa Human Steps, the Alvin Ailey Dance Foundation, Montreal’s O Vertigo Danse and with directors and choreographers such as Robert Lepage, Wajdi Mouawad, Alonso King, Jocelyne Montpetit, Marie Chouinard and Stephen Petronio. Work such as his design for the opera Kopernikus (produced by Autumn Leaf, Toronto, and the Banff Centre for the Arts in 2000) is resulting in growing recognition for him in the English-Canadian milieu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→