MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380874222 · doi:10.3138/ctr.101.012

Cultural Democracy in the Enderby and District Community Play

2000· article· en· W4380874222 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Edward Little

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandateHuman settlementDemocracyStyle (visual arts)Inclusion (mineral)SociologyGender studiesPolitical scienceMedia studiesPublic administrationGeographyLawArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These were just some of the resources mobilized over a period of eighteen months to produce The Enderby and District Community Play. Based on the Colway style developed in Britain by Ann Jellicoe during the 1980s, the play ran for ten nights between 18 and 29 May 1999. The project marks the fifth time a full-scale Collaborative Community Play has been produced in Canada and the first use of the form in BC. 1 In keeping with Colway’s mandate of “inclusivity,” the project sought to bring together residents from as many diverse backgrounds as possible to create and produce a play meeting the highest possible artistic standards. The inclusion of participants from neighbouring settlements, including the Spallumcheen band of the Shuswap First Nation, was a priority.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207