MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380874242 · doi:10.3138/ctr.105.009

Five Episodes from The Dead Dog Café Comedy Hour

2001· article· en· W4380874242 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Thomas King

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComedyDramaLaughterContext (archaeology)ArtComicsLiteraturePoliticsPerformance artHistoryVisual artsMedia studiesArt historySociologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Production History Thomas King’s The Dead Dog Café Comedy Hour is an enormously popular feature on CBC Radio One that has brought, with satiric wit, the concerns of Indians to a broad-based audience across Canada. The series is part of a long-standing Canadian tradition in Canada of CBC-produced radio drama which has provided playwrights with larger audiences for their work than if it were staged in the theatre. As satire, the series has a playful irreverence that has come to be the hallmark of much Canadian humour. Satire, however playful, has a serious side, drawing the audiences to social issues. In The Dead Dog Café Comedy Hour, the recurring readings from The Royal Commission Report on Aboriginal Peoples, a massive document detailing the conditions under which Aaboriginal peoples live, is a reminder that the concerns raised in The Report seem to have fallen from public consciousness and from the political agenda, save for this series. In the context of the series, which presents “Conversational Cree” and “Tom King’s Aboriginal Decorating Tips,” the incongruity of reading the dry prose of the Commission’s Report is funny; however, the laughter it generates has a serious bite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0190.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→