Dave veut jouer Richard III: Interrogating the Shakespearean Body in Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shakespeare has always served francophone Québec as a site of difference. He has been both a rival to Molière and an agent of the British and anglo-Canadian other. His work has been emulated and denigrated, parodied and defaced. Even when admired, the performance of Shakespeare in Québec has never been uncontaminated by its multiple colonial associations; thus, Québec adaptations of Shakespeare have also been a site of resistance: Michel Garneau’s 1978 “translation” of Macbeth into Québécois, for example, demonstrated in the context of his nationalist project that Québécois was not merely a dialect but a language, one that had the maturity and the flexibility to render the words of even Le grand Will. At the same time, given Garneau’s sense of Québec’s otherness of language, culture and politics, the ostensible act of translation could not be other than an act of adaptation – or tradaptation, the word he coined – in which Shakespeare’s Scotland became “notre pauvre pays,” the victim of a tyrannical oppressor (Brisset 199-297 and passim).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".