Bibliographic record
Abstract
Founded in 1978 by Donna Butt and David Ross, Rising Tide Theatre has come to serve as one of the bedrocks of a contemporary Newfoundland and Labrador theatrical tradition. Unlike many of its counterparts, Rising Tide has embedded itself in the province as a cultural institution, responsible for developing and sustaining an infrastructure upon which multiple generations of theatre artists, musician s and an entire community (Trinity) have come to rely. The distinction here is an important one, particularly within the context of this issue of CTR, as, in order to come to some understanding of the company’s communication paradigm, we need to acknowledge and account for the manner in which it has historically come to envision its operations and mandate as something larger than a theatre company – as a locally rooted cultural institution. Ultimately, this mandate and the communication paradigm that arose from it have been shaped in equal parts by the locations of theatrical performance and by audience perceptions of those locations, as they have been by Donna Butt’s goal of helping to establish a professional Newfoundland and Labrador theatrical tradition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".