MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380874422 · doi:10.3138/ctr.113.002

Messages from Urjo

2003· article· en· W4380874422 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martin Knelman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenerosityFriendshipGossipFeelingThe artsArtVisual artsKindnessAestheticsSociologyPsychologyArt historyPhilosophySocial psychologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urjo Kareda was known as a great man of the theatre, a brilliant critic and a passionate advocate for the arts, but to me he was much more than that. Above all, Urjo was a one-of-a-kind friend whose generosity included giving me a continuing education for thirty-five years, sharing with me his feelings about the operas, plays, movies and books which he was always devouring. And in case that sounds frightfully high-toned, 1 should add that Urjo was a talented gossip whose sharp-tongued, sarcastic observations often made me laugh. Urjo’s talent for repartee made friendship itself into an art form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→