Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caution: Copyright for this script remains with its creators, and copyright for the individual scenes remains with the playwrights who are identified as authors; in the case of material where publishers acquired rights, those rights remain with the publishers. This script is protected under the copyright laws of Canada and all other countries of the Copyright Union. Changes are forbidden without the written consent of the creators/author(s)/publishers). Rights to produce, film or record in any medium, in any language, by any group, are retained by the creators/author(s)/publisher(s). The moral right of the creators/author(s)/publisher(s) has been asserted. For performance rights contact the Playwrights’ Guild of Canada. All previously published material is reprinted here with permission. The plays were first published by Sister Vision Press (dark diaspora . . . in dub); Scirocco (Riot, Harlem Duet); Talon, for Blizzard (Consecrated Ground); Playwrights Canada Press (Angélique, yagayah, Prodigals in a Promised Land, da Kink in my hair, Sistahs, Whylah Falls); Mercury Press (Coups and Calypsos); and Gutter Press (Lambton Kent).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".