Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jazz musicians crossing boundaries between music, theatre and spoken word are rare. In general, musicians tend to shy away from speaking and acting. Apart from isolated incidents like New York pianist Cecil Taylor’s engagement in dance and poetic recitation during concerts or the antics of the Dutch ICP orchestra, most performers believe that on stage their music is sufficient. In Québec, the musicians grouped under the collective umbrella of musique actuelle, however, explicitly search out means to overstep the boundaries of traditional jazz in order to bring to the stage new intersections between creative sound and non-musical art forms. The very nature of musique actuelle is to maintain an open format in terms of musical genre (integrating jazz, electronics, noise etc.), instruments (traditional, forged or found objects) and creative process (composed or improvised music) with the implied objective that this music is actuelle (at the cutting-edge of culture in a general sense). Listening, reacting to their own social experiences, these musicians, over the years, have set out to redefine contemporary jazz. One of the ways they have done so is through a cross-fertilization with other art forms such as film, theatre, cabaret and dance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".