MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380874601 · doi:10.3138/ctr.139.008

Multi/Inter-cultural Collective: The MT Space’s <i>The Last Fifteen Seconds</i>

2009· article· en· W4380874601 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dongshin Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributeSpace (punctuation)Style (visual arts)ArtMovement (music)Visual artsMulticulturalismPresentation (obstetrics)Performance artArt historyHistorySociologyAestheticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Last Fifteen Seconds by the MT (Multicultural Theatre) Space, which premiered in October 2008 as a “collective creation-in-progress” (Poster),1 imagines and dramatizes the possible dialogues and confrontations between Moustapha Akkad (1930–2005), a Syrian-American film-maker, and Rawad Jassem Mohammed Abed (1982–2005), a suicide bomber, as they meet at and revisit each other’s lives after their fatal encounter in November 2005. In its process of creation and stage presentation, The Last Fifteen Seconds continues the collective working method and movement-based style that have characterized the works of MT Space under the leadership of its artistic director Majdi Bou-Matar. Its scenes are episodic and non-linear in structure, often presented as filmic montages, with flashbacks, slow motions and close-ups that appear to have taken inspiration from and paid tribute to Akkad’s career.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicMiddle East Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207