MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380876094 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1701

Profile split of DIB 6196 in Sco OB2 association objects

2023· article· en· W4380876094 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Г. А. Галазутдинов, J. Krełowski

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiEuropean School of Oncology
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsInterstellar cloudLine-of-sightLine (geometry)Association (psychology)UltravioletMolecular cloudAtomic physicsOpticsStarsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper describes the specific profile of the diffuse interstellar band (DIB) 6196 Å in objects belonging to the Sco OB2 association. The investigated feature is the narrowest known strong diffuse band. Reddened Sco OB2 association objects show slightly broadened and split (W-shaped) 6196 DIB profiles. The split cannot be explained by the presence of two (or more) clouds of different radial velocities along the line of sight because it is not observed in the much narrower identified atomic/molecular features. The observed DIB profile may (in some cases) be a composition of the band centre and its head of a still unknown molecule. Our estimation of the rotational temperature of C2 exhibits systematically higher values for objects with the observed split effect (Sco OB2 members). These split profiles are observed in both ζ and σ types of clouds, although in Sco OB2 objects only, suggesting that the phenomenon originates in some specific and currently unclear physical/chemical conditions inside the Sco OB2 association. It could be that a lower amount of small dust particles in Sco OB2 affects the flux of ultraviolet photons, providing a higher rotational temperature of DIB 6196 carriers, which is seen as a profile split.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→