MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380877068 · doi:10.1287/trsc.2021.0494

Charging Station Location and Sizing for Electric Vehicles Under Congestion

2023· article· en· W4380877068 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ömer Burak Kınay, Fatma Gzara, Sibel A. Alumur

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSizingBilevel optimizationQueueMathematical optimizationCharging stationProbabilistic logicComputer scienceLocation modelBenchmark (surveying)Service (business)Electric vehicleQueueing theoryOperations researchOptimization problemEngineeringComputer networkMathematicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the problem of determining the strategic location of charging stations and their capacity levels under stochastic electric vehicle flows and charging times taking into account the route choice response of users. The problem is modeled using bilevel optimization, where the network planner or leader minimizes the total infrastructure cost of locating and sizing charging stations while ensuring a probabilistic service requirement on the waiting time to charge. Electric vehicle users or followers, on the other hand, minimize route length and may be cooperative or noncooperative. Their choice of route in turn determines the charging demand and waiting times at the charging stations and hence, the need to account for their decisions by the leader. The bilevel problem reduces to a single-level mixed-integer model using the optimality conditions of the follower’s problem when the charging stations operate as M/M/c queues and the followers are cooperative. To solve the bilevel model, a decomposition-based solution methodology is developed that uses a new logic-based Benders algorithm for the location-only problem. Computational experiments are performed on benchmark and real-life highway networks, including a new eastern U.S. network. The impact of route choice response, service requirements, and deviation tolerance on the location and sizing decisions are analyzed. The analysis demonstrates that stringent service requirements increase the capacity levels at open charging stations rather than their number and that solutions allowing higher deviations are less costly. Moreover, the difference between solutions under cooperative and uncooperative route choices is more significant when the deviation tolerance is lower. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on 2021 TSL Workshop: Supply and Demand Interplay in Transport and Logistics. Funding: This research was supported by the Ontario Graduate Scholarship when Ö. B. Kınay was a PhD candidate at the University of Waterloo, and this support is acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.0494 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation ScienceSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207