EFFECTS OF CIJI HUA’AI BAOSHENG FORMULA ON APOPTOSIS CORRELATION FACTORS OF TUMOR CHEMOTHERAPY MODEL MOUSE WITH H22 HEPATOMA CARCINOMA CELLS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ciji Hua’ai Baosheng Formula (CHBF) is a traditional Chinese empirical formula that can help the tumor patients who received chemotherapy to antagonize the toxin and side-effects so as to improve and prolong the life. This study is to evaluate the effects of Ciji Hua’ai Baosheng Formula on apoptosis correlation factors of transplanted tumor chemotherapy model mouse with H22 hepatoma carcinoma cells through detecting the protein level of serum Bax, Bcl-2, Caspase-3, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the protein expression of CyclinD1 in femur bone marrow.
 Materials and Methods: H22 hepatoma carcinoma cells were cultivated and diluted to 2×107/ml, and a total of 50 specific pathogen-free Kunming mice were injected subcutaneously into the right anterior armpit with H22 hepatoma carcinoma cells, after 7 days, all mice had formed tumors and were used peritoneal injection of Cytoxan (CTX) (200mg/kg) to establish the mouse chemotherapy model with transplanted tumor, then they were randomly divided into 5 groups such as model, positive control (CTX, 0.033g/kg) and three CHBF (117g/kg, 58.5g/kg and 29.25g/kg) groups with 10 mice in each group. They were administered next day after making model. Survival state was observed. After administering for 10 days, pathological tissue structural change was detected by light microscope, blood was collected through pricking eyeball, protein level of serum Bax, Bcl-2, Caspase-3 and EGFR was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the protein expression of CyclinD1 in femur bone marrow was detected by immunohistochemisty.
 Results: Under the light microscope, the deteriorated degree of tumor tissue and the proliferation degree of tumor cells in three CHBF groups were obviously milder than that of model group. The protein content of the pro-apoptotic gene Bax and effective enzyme Caspase-3 in CHBF (58.5g/kg and 29.25g/kg) groups were obviously higher than that of model groups (P
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".