MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380877850 · doi:10.36040/pawon.v7i1.4442

Penentuan Analisa Tapak Secara Makro, Messo dan Mikro Dalam Proses Penetapan Tapak.

2023· article· id· W4380877850 on OpenAlex
Ghoustan Putra, Redi Sigit Febrianto, Budi Fathoni

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePawon Jurnal Arsitektur · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desa Wisata adalah gagasan desa mandiri yang tanggap terhadap potensi desa dan minat wisatawan. Desa Mangliawan yang terletak di kabupaten Malang memiliki potensi wisata desa berupa destinasi Taman Wisata Taman Sangaloh. Namun Potensi ini tidak di iringi oleh ketersediaanya fasilitator pendamping dalam pengembangan desa wisata ini. Berbekal dari latar belakang tersebut desa Mangliawan membutuhkan sebuah gagasan metode pendekatan sosial yang berbasis masyarakat yang dapat memberikan kontribusi gagasan melalui forum diskusi, FGD maupun bentuk metode pendekatan sosial yang lain dalam pengembangan desa Mangliawan khususnya Kawasan wisata taman Sengaloh. Penentuan Analisa Tapak secara Makro, Messo dan mikro adalaha salah satu proses metode pendekatan yang digunakan fasilitator dalam mendampingi desa. Pada ulasan literatur ini, di dapatkan metode penetapan Analisa tapak dengan data primer dan sekunder melaui FGD (Focus Grup Discussion).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it