MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380880761 · doi:10.3138/ctr.114.001

Where Were You in ’52?

2003· article· en· W4380880761 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jerry Wasserman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvictionLawDreamPower (physics)Supreme courtHistoryAppealOptimismAncient historyArtPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Released on the appropriately named Modern label, John Lee Hooker’s upbeat blues reflects the mixture of anxiety and optimism that reigned during the fall of 1952 in both the United States and Canada, as plans for the new Stratford Shakespearean Festival proceeded apace. Of troubles there were plenty. The Korean War raged on even as the Americans elected a new President, Dwight D. Eisenhower, who promised to end it. The Cold War heated up under the mushroom clouds of A-bomb tests and the imminent hydrogen bomb. The Red scare was at its height, embodied in the frightening power of Senator Joe McCarthy and marked, that October, by the US Supreme Court’s rejection of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg’s appeal of their conviction for passing atomic secrets to the Russians, for which they would be executed a few months later.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1540.078

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207