MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380880778 · doi:10.3138/ctr.121.012

Indirections: Evolution, Not Revolution, at the Shaw Festival

2005· article· en· W4380880778 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guy Bannerman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyPrecinctArtPerformance artShot (pellet)FellVisual artsHistoryCartographyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On May 14, 2002, a curious scene was enacted on the stage of the Shaw Festival Theatre in Niagara-on-the-Lake. In a New York City precinct police station, the setting for Neil Munro’s acclaimed production of Sidney Kingsley’s Detective Story, a mysterious trench-coated figure in the obligatory slouch-brimmed fedora entered into the half-light. As the figure roamed among the desks, a second figure, similarly clad, entered behind the first: A gun blazed; the first fell victim to the second, the victim’s fedora rolling away across the floor. Calmly, the newcomer stood over the body, then deliberately picked up the fallen hat. Looking it over, the murderer came to a decision. The fallen hat replaced the fedora on the head of the stranger, the rejected hat was tossed onto the floor beside the body. The murderer posed proudly in the dim room. As the assembled members of the Shaw acting company laughed and cheered, the lights came up and the figures took their bows: Christopher Newton, outgoing Artistic Director, swiftly recovering from the murderous shot, and Jackie Maxwell, Artistic Director Designate, stepping dramatically into the Shaw spotlight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0150.035
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicLiterature Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207