MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380880778 · doi:10.3138/ctr.121.012

Indirections: Evolution, Not Revolution, at the Shaw Festival

2005· article· en· W4380880778 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guy Bannerman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyPrecinctArtPerformance artShot (pellet)FellVisual artsHistoryCartographyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On May 14, 2002, a curious scene was enacted on the stage of the Shaw Festival Theatre in Niagara-on-the-Lake. In a New York City precinct police station, the setting for Neil Munro’s acclaimed production of Sidney Kingsley’s Detective Story, a mysterious trench-coated figure in the obligatory slouch-brimmed fedora entered into the half-light. As the figure roamed among the desks, a second figure, similarly clad, entered behind the first: A gun blazed; the first fell victim to the second, the victim’s fedora rolling away across the floor. Calmly, the newcomer stood over the body, then deliberately picked up the fallen hat. Looking it over, the murderer came to a decision. The fallen hat replaced the fedora on the head of the stranger, the rejected hat was tossed onto the floor beside the body. The murderer posed proudly in the dim room. As the assembled members of the Shaw acting company laughed and cheered, the lights came up and the figures took their bows: Christopher Newton, outgoing Artistic Director, swiftly recovering from the murderous shot, and Jackie Maxwell, Artistic Director Designate, stepping dramatically into the Shaw spotlight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicLiterature Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207