Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canada Summer Games, based in Regina in August 2005, and the University of Regina’s Transdisciplinary Fund are enabling the production of a unique performance experiment called Challenging Bodies. This project, part theatre, part dance, part multimedia event, attempts to investigate the link between the spark of creative imagination and the act of fully realized physical expression. As well, it will attempt to problematize the notion of physical excellence by celebrating movement, however limited in scope, and enhancing and amplifying that movement through sophisticated technology. Indeed, inasmuch as the project is developing within a university environment, it is also part research, which attempts to intersect with communities that do not, typically, engage in shared dialogue. A multidisciplinary collective of theatre and intermedia artists, academics, choreographers, musicians, computer scientists, kinesiologists and otherwise-abled performers is initiating a process of exploration and experimentation that will, by presenting a high-calibre performance inclusive of physical difference, challenge spectators and provide an intriguing alternative to the competitive athleticism of the Summer Games.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".