Bibliographic record
Abstract
From 13 to 15 January 2005, the SuicideGirls Live! burlesque show appeared as part of the High Performance Rodeo in Calgary, Alberta. Straddling the boundaries of feminism, popular culture and, indeed, definitions of performance art and theatre, the SuicideGirls performance highlights the diversity of the festival phenomenon in Canada. Performing any kind of work at a festival invites a contextual analysis. As Jill Dolan writes in Presence and Desire, in reference to heterosexual and lesbian spaces, “[C]ontexts make the terms of the performative exchange very different, even if the images used or roles played are the same” (127). In a Canadian context, festivals range from the populist Fringes to the high art Festival de Théâtre des Amériques to the venerable Stratford and Shaw to the brand new Magnetic North. Women’s work has a place at all of these to varying degrees, seldom in a major or central capacity. On the other hand, works by women in these contexts take on the attributes of the festival and are read as enacting the mandate of the curator, whoever she or he may be.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".