MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380880963 · doi:10.3138/ctr.128.013

Duncan Mcintosh’s Island Paradise

2006· article· en· W4380880963 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kent Stetson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt historyBayDanceBeautyArchaeologyHistoryVisual artsAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outside his home on the spectacular north shore of Prince Edward Island — with its sunset view to the northwest, gulf horizon due north and marram grass dunes above — Duncan Mcintosh contemplates reinvention. In a burst of light on water, flocks of migratory waterfowl circle Stanhope Bay, lower knee-locked landing gear, spread webbed feet, stretch long necks, then settle perfunctorily on the surface. Amid much flap, squawk and chatter, Canada geese, mallards and blue-winged teal soon settle into spring routines, courting on the surface, up-ending to feed below, their airy, fluid patterns driven by tide, current and wind. Bald eagles, osprey and hawks circle overhead. A red fox bitch parades her four tumbling pups. Four years on, the grace and beauty of PEI’s spring awakening continues to intrigue Duncan. “Who,” he wonders, “choreographs this miraculous ballet?” Interesting question from Mcintosh, a director/producer as comfortable directing the Shaw Festival’s classically trained veterans as choreographing and directing the shiny new singer/dancer/actor cast of the remount of his production of Island impresario Campbell Webster’s new L.M. Montgomery—based hit musical, Anne and Gilbert.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicLiterature Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207