MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380880977 · doi:10.3138/ctr.122.020

Drama in the Maritimes: Tides (Plays) Are Strong

2005· article· en· W4380880977 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
George Belliveau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaNova scotiaPopulationReading (process)HistoryThe artsArtArt historyVisual artsSociologyPolitical scienceLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During a keynote address at the 2004 Shifting Tides: Atlantic Canadian Theatre conference, Mary Vingoe noted how, despite the fact that the population of the Atlantic region is small and that the arts are severely underfunded (making it a challenging place to work for theatre artists), Atlantic Canada arguably produces the country’s best English dramatic poets. The recently published anthology Marigraph: Gauging the Tides of Drama from New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island clearly illustrates and supports Vingoe’s claim. This welcome collection, edited by Bruce Barton, highlights ten contemporary plays from the Maritime provinces. A number of the writers included in the anthology, such as Wendy Lill, Daniel MacIvor and Kent Stetson, are nationally and internationally recognized playwrights, while some of the others have been producing fine work for a number of years within the Maritimes despite not being nationally recognized (yet!). Each play has had at least one professional production, and it is easy to imagine its stage potential in a reading. Like Jerry Wasserman’s Modern Canadian Plays, this anthology provides educators, researchers, producers, practitioners and the general public a diverse collection of plays that, I think, read, play and teach well, in addition to enlightening the mind and spirit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0110.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→