MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380880981 · doi:10.3138/ctr.126.014

Monolith Makeover: The Art of Subversive Urban Enhancement

2006· article· en· W4380880981 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Zoë Stonyk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Therapy and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHollywoodArtRomanceDowntownVisual artsPassionArt historyMonolithHistoryArchaeologyLiteraturePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, I was in a tall building in downtown Toronto with a panoramic south-facing window. I stopped for a minute to gaze at the endless stream of automobiles flowing along the Gardiner Expressway. As I spied on the concrete arteries bringing travellers to and through the city’s heart, my own heart bubbled over with memories of our summer fling. Suddenly, I felt like the heroine of a Hollywood movie contemplating a past lover from a distance with tenderness and passion. I was haunted by romantic recollections of the fleeting artistic relationship I had enjoyed with this highway. In the universe of site-specific installation and performance, the physical evidence of work may fade or vanish after minutes or months, but the memories, as they say, linger on.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicArt Therapy and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207