Neural mass framework for decoding amyloid and Tau impact on neuronal activity under Alzheimer’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background We introduce a computational brain network model to understand the effect of abnormal microscopical processes into non‐invasive macroscopic neuronal activity observations and cognitive impairment across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) spectrum. Amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques and tau protein aggregates (τ) modulate neuronal firing with the former likely increasing firing (hyperactivity) and the latter inhibiting activity (hypoactivity), especially in the abundant pyramidal populations ‐see (Maestu et al., 2021) for more details. We assume that such interactions scale up to macroscopic regions in humans, specifically influencing resting‐state fMRI signals. Method Multimodal data, including amyloid ([18F]Florbetapir) and tau ([18F]flortaucipir) PET, baseline resting‐state fMRI, structural and diffusion MRI, and clinical/cognitive indicators were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The imaging modalities were processed to produce values for a parcellation consisting of 66 brain regions. We considered four neural masses interacting within a region. The regional excitatory and inhibitory activities then transform into BOLD signals (Valdes‐Sosa et al., 2009) ‐see Fig. 1A. Pyramidal excitabilities (v0E,k) contain the Aβ‐ and τ‐ parameters of interest, and their combined effect (Fig. 1B), which we estimated by minimizing the spectral distance between simulated signals and observations. Result The synergy between disease factors seems to change with disease states and subjects (Fig. 1C). Most of the considered healthy controls (HC) presented relatively low excitability change by Aβ and by τ, albeit having a greater, generally positive or ‘towards hypoactivity’ combined action. Mild cognitive impairment subjects appeared in two sub‐groups, one significantly close to the HC and another with stronger individual effects and smaller joined action. All AD patients presented positive synergistic effects and relatively high independent contributions to pyramidal population firing, as estimated from the data. Conclusion The obtained significant, subject‐specific influences of pathological factors on neural activity verify the interactions reported by (Busche et al., 2020) in animal models experiments at the mesoscopic scale. There exist causal relationships between the amyloid and tau influence parameters and clinical variables. Further research must be performed to clarify characteristic disease trajectories as effective sub‐typing in early stages could improve therapeutic interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".